Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2011 10:55:19 GMT -5
Cubs: 70 Mariners: 63
Orioles: 53 Phillies: 53 Giants: 52
Red Sox: 46 White Sox: 43 Braves: 43 Astros: 42 Twins: 42 Yankees: 40 Rays: 40
Beavers: 38 Rangers: 38 Pirates: 36 Rockies: 36 Nationals: 35 Tigers: 34 Marlins: 31 A's: 31 Dodgers: 30 Indians: 30
Mets: 29 Angels: 28 Royals: 26 Blue Jays: 23 Brewers: 22 Cardinals: 20
Warhounds: 19 D-Backs: 17 Padres: 12 Reds: 12
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2011 11:25:08 GMT -5
On what are these based on again?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2011 11:34:28 GMT -5
Popularity of players and market size. Not sure of the ratio. Performance is not a factor IIRC.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2011 12:22:29 GMT -5
Sorry I didn't see this thread earlier. The formula I use is below. Performance becomes more of a factor as the season goes along. I'd say it has no factor in April, a very slight factor in May, a decent factor in June, and a bigger factor in July and August, and becomes a heavy factor in September.
I look at the National Popularity ratings of everybody on every team.
Extremely Popular players get 10 points. Very Popular 7 Popular 5 Well Known 3 Fair 1
I then look at the market sizes. Astronomical markets add 10 points Huge 9 Very Big 7 Big 6 Rather Big 5 Above Average 3 Average 2 Below Average 1 Small 0 Tiny -1
I then combine and get a number.
|
|