|
Post by AstrosGM_Shane on Jun 27, 2014 11:26:22 GMT -5
Not in favor... this feels like one of those 'if it's not broken, why fix it' things? with sam, 100% Me too. The strategy of having to make a 25 man roster is far more challenging then over the strategy created by having to work in 1 million dollars into the budget.
|
|
|
Post by Derek _ Red Sox on Jun 28, 2014 20:16:53 GMT -5
Why stop at 27? let's do 30. I think this is very enticing to playoff teams and teams with high budgets who have often missed a key missing piece for a complete champion juggernaut due to only being able to keep 25 guys. let's keep it that way This would be enticing for playoff teams because its a legit strategy and benefit but it SHOULD be a benefit to the teams who are in last as well as maybe it could help turn their bad fortunes...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2014 18:14:29 GMT -5
Against. Don't see any real reason to do this.
|
|
|
Post by BlueJaysGM_Fin on Jul 1, 2014 17:21:24 GMT -5
To be honest, I've chosen to see this from the perspective of what we have now. In other words, we have a 25 man roster currently. What arguments make me compelled to want to change to a 27 man roster. To be fair, it is a valid raise and suggestion. But I'm afraid the arguments presented to raise the roster is not compelling enough to make me want to change.
Think of this as a review play in baseball. The call is made on the field, so there should be compelling evidence to over-rule the play on the field and change the call. I just don't see a valid argument for change based on current suggestions and arguments.
Hope that made sense.
|
|
|
Post by AstrosGM_Shane on Jul 1, 2014 17:41:16 GMT -5
I am definitely not in favor if this rule. It is way more challenging with a 25 man roster then 27.
|
|
|
Post by Tim_GiantsGM on Jul 2, 2014 1:06:38 GMT -5
I prefer to retain the 25 man roster for the reasons several others articulated.
|
|